Home › Compare › WMT vs COST

WMT vs COST — Head-to-Head 2026

Walmart vs Costco: OVR ratings, revenue growth, valuation, and volatility compared.

WMT — Cracked e-commerce. Ads growing 30%+. OVR: 86 (A-Tier).

COST — 90%+ membership renewal. Near-pure-profit fees. OVR: 89 (S-Tier).

HEAD-TO-HEAD

METRICWMT — WalmartCOST — Costco
OVR Rating8689
TierA-TierS-Tier
Momentum Score58/10062/100
Stability Score90/10092/100
Value Score68/10065/100
Revenue Growth+6%+7%
P/E Ratio35x52x
Beta0.550.65
Market Cap$740B$400B
Dividend Yield1.2%0.7%
S&P 500YesYes

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Which is stronger, WMT or COST?
MarketMVP rates WMT at 86 OVR (A-Tier) and COST at 89 OVR (S-Tier). COST scores higher.
Is WMT more volatile than COST?
WMT beta: 0.55. COST beta: 0.65. COST is more volatile.
Which has higher revenue growth?
WMT: +6%. COST: +7%. COST is growing faster.
EXPLORE BOTH ON MARKETMVP →
WMT Full Analysis COST Full Analysis All Comparisons

Educational purposes only. MarketMVP OVR scores and ratings are educational tools — not financial advice or recommendations. Always do your own research. Full disclaimer